And the And we start the show with a buzzard message.

Buzzard writes. message.

Buzzard writes in, I guess your boy Jeremy McNickles can't pass block. Fantasy mansion fails again. That's right, I fails again.

That's right, I failed again, I failed again, I failed again, and I will continue to fail over and over and over and over again. Why will I fail consistently? Because I have strong

sports opinions about most players in the league. If there's a fantasy viable fantasy relevant player, odds are I have expressed a strident opinion one way or another about that players, quality about that players

projected fantasy football output for the following season.

That's just how I roll.

Sure, I could start every sentence with a caveat, a softener.

I think that this player might.

I think that this player could.

But I don't do that.

We leave it to the other analysts. That might be it for Mark as Wilson. Remember might be I wasn't wrong he roared

back somewhere else? No I will be wrong. I will be wrong frequently throughout the season. And as I am being wrong, I will swagger. I am a swashbuckling fantasy football analyst. And I'm one of the few. I'm one of the few I am one of the few who consistently

Gives strong opinions with conviction. It's something that is missing across the fantasy football landscape. Conviction, bravado, self-assured

definitive positions on players. No softeners, no caveats, no mites, no coulds, just what I think will happen and why I think it will happen.

I can have conviction in my positions because they are backed by data.

They are not backed by feelings.

They are not backed by what I read some guy saw on film. They're backed by hard evidence-based analysis.

The information I use to support my arguments is derived from a quantitative underpinning.

Things we can measure.

That's where the confidence comes from.

But of course, we can't measure everything.

...