Anyone naive enough to think that we had heard the last of the Baker Mayfield Johnny Manzel comparisons? Oh boy! We're just getting warmed up.

Right, we are. I'm already agitated just thinking about the lazy Mayfield

Manzell Comps were going to be treated to in the next three months. I mean, I thought that it couldn't

get worse than the early

January coach talk the NFL coach hot stove which is the worst season of

NFL analysis well seems I forgot about NFL draft talk. What time during

the year do I actually like consuming football analysis? Right? Do I actually enjoy

consuming what the sports media industrial complex

puts on my plate on a daily basis? I guess never. I guess I'm always in a state of

agitation or dismay or frustration or indignation.

It's always something because we're so rarely treated to rich, comprehensive quality football analysis.

I mean that's my larger objection.

That's the objection that spans the entire year.

Coach-centric analysis, lazy, most NFL draft prospect analysis, lazy, and the

Mayfield-Manzell Comp epitomizes lazy NFL draft analysis, but Tony Grossy from E.S.B.N. Cleveland is here to tell you that, oh no, oh no.

Comparisons of Baker Mayfield to Johnny Manzel are fair and appropriate.

It's not lazy analysis.

No.

And Grocy proceeds to go on and write 250 words explaining why the Manzel-Mayfield Comp is not unfair, it is not lazy, it is appropriate in quotes.

And the article on ESPN reads as follows,

both were scintillating college players with dynamic personalities and incredible

competitiveness.

...