meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Best of the Spectator

Michael Shellenberger: What Just Stop Oil gets wrong and COP27 corruption

Best of the Spectator

The Spectator

News Commentary, News, Daily News, Society & Culture

4.4785 Ratings

🗓️ 15 November 2022

⏱️ 64 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

With climate activists around the world vandalising great works by Monet, van Gogh and Goya, Winston speaks with environmentalist, conservationist and pro-nuclear activist Michael Shellenberger. They discuss the validity of Just Stop Oil's methods and environmental imperialism at this years United Nations Climate Change Conference. They take a deep dive into Shellenberger's book 'Apocalypse Never', evaluate the environmentalist case for fracking and consider why nuclear will save us all. 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The Spectator magazine combines incisive political analysis with books and arts reviews of unrivaled authority. absolutely free. Go to spectator.com.uk forward slash voucher.

0:26.3

Hello and welcome to Marshall Matters with me, Winston Marshall, for The Spectator. Today I am in San Francisco with environmentalist, conservationist, pro-nuclear activist, author of the book's Apocalypse Never,

0:39.8

Why Environmental Alarmism Harts Us All, and San Francisco, Why Progressives Ruined Cities, Michael Schellenberger.

0:47.7

Thanks for having me.

0:48.5

Michael, it's a great pleasure to have the opportunity to speak.

0:50.7

Thank you to taking the time.

0:52.7

So you're a lifelong democrat here in the

0:54.5

u.s uh even running as democrat candidate in the 2018 California gubernatorial elections

1:00.0

before leaving the party and running again this year 2020 as an independent yes how was that

1:06.0

it was a blast yeah a great time yeah it was um know, it was very short as three months, but it wasn't, the thing that

1:15.3

you fear is that you've just spent all your time raising money and didn't have to do that.

1:20.2

If I had succeeded and made it into the runoff, then I probably would have had to do more

1:23.4

of it.

1:23.9

But we had a great time and we were able to elevate this issue that we were so

1:28.0

concerned about, which is the large number of mentally ill and addicted people living on the

1:32.7

streets. But also the broader challenges facing California, including on energy issues. So it was

1:38.5

great to be able to raise those issues. We were disappointed that we didn't make it into the runoff,

1:42.2

but it was overall a positive experience.

1:45.1

Do you think you brought those issues to the four, so that they're now spoken about differently

1:50.6

than they were before? Yeah, for sure. I mean, the book, San Francisco had an impact as well,

1:55.6

just on the overall conversation around the media, but I think running on that issue, it would just allow more opportunities to kind of get

2:02.9

the message out and to challenge particular ideas that people have.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.