meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
More or Less: Behind the Stats

Mice and mind blowing maths

More or Less: Behind the Stats

BBC

Business, Mathematics, Science, News Commentary, News

4.63.5K Ratings

🗓️ 16 August 2019

⏱️ 9 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Re-inserting a caveat and discussing a really cool numbers trick.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, Tim Halford here. Thanks very much for downloading our podcast. Just a quick word

0:06.7

of warning. The two topics that we cover here are ones that loyal listeners may have heard

0:11.8

before. One of them is about science in mice and the other is about top mathematical tricks

0:16.8

that you can enjoy. Hello and welcome to more or less on the BBC World Service. We're

0:25.1

the programme that holds up the mirror of truth to the world of shady statistics. And I'm Tim

0:30.0

Halford. Australian scientist James Heathers has been getting a lot of attention on Twitter by

0:37.0

standing up for the underdog or rather the under mouse. The two magic words are in mice because

0:47.6

that's the only qualification that you need to make a lot of headlines and brief article

0:54.0

descriptions about scientific items into something that's a lot more accurate.

1:00.0

So how does it work? James' retweet science stories are complemented by that simple two-word caveat.

1:06.5

Let's give it a go.

1:11.0

Compounds found in carrots reverse Alzheimer's-like symptoms.

1:16.3

In mice.

1:18.1

In mice.

1:26.3

Exercise at night will give you better results. In mice.

1:33.5

Some headlines go even further saying women when they mean female mice or even referring to the

1:39.8

lab mice as patients. Reused cooking oil ups risk of metastases in breast cancer patients.

1:48.0

In mice.

1:52.4

I love the idea of mice as patients because I immediately imagine tiny little hospital

1:58.0

gowns and caps and tiny little shoes for clean rooms. There's something that's really quite

2:03.7

adorable about it but it's obviously ridiculous. But is it really a problem? A few journalists

2:09.4

trying to juja a boring old science story? After all, a potential new medicine working is a good

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.