Ladies and gentlemen, the following segment of the podcast is presented exclusively by Hillsdale College.

For over 175 years, four purposes have defined Hillsdale's mission, learning character, faith and freedom.

Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to our brothers and sisters at Hillsdale for their great sponsorship.

Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to our brothers and sisters at Hillsdale College.

Thank you for listening and my sincere appreciation to our brothers and sisters at Hillsdale College.

Hello America, you're the right place to see me.

I should be here every evening actually, but that's okay. I am Mark Lovin.

Well, the decision finally came after almost half a century.

But here's the thing folks, Roe vs Wade was overturned a long time ago.

By the US Supreme Court about 20 years after it made the Roe vs Wade decision in the Casey decision.

In the Casey decision, Roe vs Wade set up try-mesters.

And in the final try-mester, the last three months, the state had an interest in protecting the baby.

Roe recognized that it was a baby.

Didn't say the state had to protect it, but it recognized that there was a state interest, so there would be some limits.

The decision itself was based on everything and based on nothing. I'll prove it to you.

In the 1973 decision written by Harry Blackman, one of the dumbest men I've ever served on the court, he cited various justices and rulings in the past that looked at the fourth amendment, the fifth amendment,

the so-called penumbers and emanations of the Bill of Rights, the 14th amendment,

wherever they could look because it was a result looking for a constitutional argument.

Most of the people today screaming outside, most of the Democrats, people like Murkowski and Collins,

have actually never read the Roe vs Wade decision or the Casey decision.

Most of the journalists haven't read either decision.

And on the spot analysis of the decision today was widespread and yet none of them had read today's decision.

...