He's here.

here.

Now broadcasting from the underground command post.

Deep in the fouls of a hidden bunker,

somewhere under the brick and steel of a non-descript building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark Lavin. The The The The The And the Hello America, Mark Levin here, our number 877 381, 3811, 877 381, 3811, 877 381, 3811, 877, 381, man, O, Man of Shepherds, we've got a lot of territory to cover.

You're with me?

You're the only audience I can handle this. I want to talk about the First Amendment briefly.

One of the great experts on the First Amendment and other parts of the Constitution is a gentleman by the name of Nathan Lewin.

Nathan Lewin has litigated in front of the Supreme Court and America's Apollo courts more times than I can count.

He's a brilliant man.

He's taught at Harvard and Columbia and Georgetown and University of Chicago. But he with his

brilliant daughter, they run their own firm. They bring their own cases. Big, big cases, big Supreme Court cases, big

First Amendment cases. So he wrote a piece in JNS.org, JNS, new syndicate.org, explaining the First Amendment to University Presidents, it's called. Syndicate. that the First Amendment does not protect anti-Semitic hate speech or support for terrorism.

In the wake of the astounding testimony before Congress by the presidents of Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania,

the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, three important questions must be asked.

Number one, why are the presidents of leading American universities

abysmally ignorant of Supreme Court rulings on the limits of protected speech

under the First Amendment? The President's claimed in their testimony

that anti-Israel and anti-Semitic protesters, quote unquote,

on their campuses are only exercising

their constitutionally protected right to free speech when they call for an intifada

and Chan Hamas's battle cry from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.

...