4.5 • 21.8K Ratings
🗓️ 2 December 2021
⏱️ 11 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | This episode is brought to you by Slack. With Slack, you can bring all your people and |
0:05.8 | tools together in one place. It's your digital HQ where you can increase productivity, |
0:11.0 | enable flexibility and automate workflows. Plus, Slack is full of game-changing features |
0:16.7 | like huddles for quick check-ins or Slack Connect, which helps you connect with partners |
0:20.9 | inside and outside of your company. Slack, where the future works. Get started at |
0:26.9 | Slack.com slash DHQ. |
1:56.9 | Hello, America. Mark Levin here. Our number 877-3813-811-877-3813-811. You're at the right |
2:11.6 | place because there's a big case before the Supreme Court involving the State of Mississippi |
2:18.2 | and its law, its law respecting abortion. Now, it's time for a little bit of background |
2:28.6 | here because the reporting on this is not only hysterical, it's unconscionable. The question |
2:35.7 | before the court is whether the Mississippi law, in their view, violates the federal |
2:44.2 | constitution or not. And so, the further question is whether or not that will influence the |
2:54.4 | Roe vs. Wade decision. The Roe vs. Wade decision does not have a syllable of constitutionality |
3:03.4 | in it, not one. It's not just Scalia and Thomas and Alito and others who've said that. |
3:13.4 | That's right. Ruth Bader Ginsburg. Although she supports it and supported a radical abortion |
3:19.1 | agenda, she acknowledged the fact that it's not in the Constitution and that the Roe vs. |
3:25.4 | Wade decision wasn't a very well-crested decision. It was crefted by Harry Blackman, |
3:30.6 | really by his clerks, his law clerks. And it basically is a decision that is rambling, |
3:36.9 | it's largely incoherent that uses psychoanalysis. There is absolutely nothing in the 14th amendment |
3:44.1 | despite what the Solister General of the United States argued, despite what Charles Fried |
3:51.7 | says up there at Harvard, former Solister General under Reagan, they keep mentioning. Yeah, |
3:56.7 | he was a Solister General under Reagan, but that doesn't give him the credentials. As |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cumulus Podcast Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Cumulus Podcast Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.