You're listening to the Judicial Watch weekly update with Tom Fitton.

Hey everyone, Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton here with our weekly update on social media.

Judicial Watch's legal team has been working hard this week, prepping for what may be one of the most important Supreme Court cases in recent American history, at least

as it relates to election laws in the way your elections are conducted.

The oral argument in this important case takes place on Monday, March 23rd.

Judicial Watch's legal team will be presenting the argument on behalf of the libertarian party of

Mississippi. The RNC is also involved in the case, and we are on the side of the Trump

administration as well, over whether or not federal law precludes or prohibits the counting of ballots that arrive after election day,

a relatively simple issue, you would think, but one that has reached the Supreme Court.

And I tell you, if it goes our way in terms of having a lower court ruling for finding that

that it is a violation of federal law to count ballots that arrive late.

That means state laws and upwards of 30 plus states will be overturned effectively.

And states will have to start making sure that in order for ballots to be counted, they are there by election day.

So if you're mailing in your ballots, under our theory, you got to mail them in soon,

early enough to ensure that they get there by election day because federal law sets an election day,

not an election week, not an election month. Some states count ballots.

In Washington State, for example, they allow ballots to arrive for up to 21 days after election

day. California, seven days. Illinois, two weeks. Mississippi, which is the case at issue here, five days.

Now Judicial Watch has taken the lead role in pushing this issue before the courts,

because we got, for instance, the first ruling finding, at least at the circuit level,

the appellate level, that

the counting of ballots that are received late is improper under federal law. And as I said,

...