meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Drilled

Malcolm Harris on the Radical, Liberating Possibilities of Realism

Drilled

Critical Frequency

True Crime, Earth Sciences, Social Sciences, Science

4.82.3K Ratings

🗓️ 20 May 2025

⏱️ 52 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In his latest book, What's Left: Three Paths Through the Planetary Crisis, Malcolm Harris encourages us to see the climate crisis for the complicated and terrifying problem that it is and tackle it at the scale it deserves. Here, he speaks to reporter Adam Lowenstein about what that looks like and how surprisingly good it can feel. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome back to Drilled. I'm Amy Westervelt. We have a new season coming for you starting June 3rd.

0:09.3

But in the meantime, I wanted to bring you this interview that reporter Adam Lowenstein did with journalist and author Malcolm Harris.

0:16.6

You may have come across Harris's work in New York Magazine or his book, Palo Alto.

0:22.4

I particularly enjoyed his take on the abundance pros recently in The Baffler.

0:28.2

Harris has a new book out now called What's Left that tackles how we can save both democracy and the planet.

0:34.9

It's a great read and this conversation is a great listen. Enjoy.

0:39.3

Thank you. Thanks for being here, Malcolm.

0:55.2

Yeah, thanks for having me here.

0:56.9

So I wanted to ask you to start, I have my own theory of this, but I'm curious what you see as the purpose of your book.

1:04.1

Oh, I want to hear your theory. I should hear it before I hear my theory, then you're going to copy me.

1:10.2

When I set out to write this book, at first I thought,

1:13.9

I'm going to write about why I'm right and everyone else is wrong. Everyone who even sort of agrees

1:18.5

with me is wrong. And they all need to completely agree to me with me. And I have the only

1:23.8

explanation for how we get through the climate crisis. And when people read

1:28.2

my brilliant explanation, they'll have no choice but to agree with me in my understanding.

1:34.2

And then I thought about that for a second and thought, like, well, that's not true.

1:38.2

Like, that won't happen. Even if I make a spectacular argument, I could convince, people, but most people are probably doing what they're doing.

1:50.6

Even people on the left, as I'm broadly considering it, who don't agree with me on specifics, are doing what they're doing for a number of reasons, not just because they're particularly convinced, but because they have a temperamental affinity with what they're doing. They have, like,

2:05.7

interpersonal commitments. You know, people, we live in a society, you know, and I wasn't going to

2:11.0

remake that society by making an argument. And so I decided the most useful thing I could do

2:16.8

was operating from some base of shared understanding

2:22.3

give a sort of showcase of what I think are the relevant ideological paths that the left has open to it right now.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Critical Frequency, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Critical Frequency and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.