Coming up, Debbie and I are going to talk together about the historic flipping of a democratic seat in Debbie's home area of South Texas.

Huge development. Well, it's going to talk about the implications of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, essentially making it impossible for the Attorney General to prosecute election fraud.

Some new developments concerning 2000 mules with people like Ann Colter and Alan Derser, which is weighing in. I'll offer a couple of thoughts and I'm going to go into this.

The latest revelation of plagiarism by Princeton's leftist historian, Kevin Cruz. This is the Dineshtus' issue.

America needs this voice. The times are crazy and the time of confusion, division and lies. We need a brave voice of reason to understanding and truth. This is the Dineshtus Sousa podcast.

I'm in the throes of finishing the book 2000 mules that goes with the movie. Now, typically in the past with Hillary's America, Death of a Nation, I've released the book and the movie at the same time.

They go concurrently in some ways. The book promotes the movie, the movie promotes the book. But in this case, I was going to do that, but I decided to accelerate. Our team just came together and we said, let's just get this movie done.

The movie kind of outran the book. Now, books and movies are two different things. You can do things in a book that you can't do in a movie. You can have levels of detail and documentation. You can put in stuff that doesn't really work in a movie because it's not visual.

The movie is really a visual event. But a book is a little bit more like a legal brief. This book has come together beautifully. I'm really happy with it. I'm going to have actually a photo section in the book. I kind of call these photos and I've been writing the captions for them.

So you can pre-order the book on Amazon now. It's just called 2000 Mules. Same title as the movie is coming out in late August.

But the movie continues to have really good traction. More people are kind of weighing in on it. I like to comment on too. Well, a word first about Bill Barr. I went back and listened to his comments.

The first thing that struck me was the guy was kept talking about photographs because I'm looking for photographs of the same Mule at multiple locations. I thought to myself nobody who saw the movie would say that because the movie doesn't have any photographs in his videos. Surveillance video.

And so it was Barr simply making a verbal mistake by referring to photographs. I don't think so. I think it really shows that he hasn't seen the movies. He's read some of the fact checks. And that's probably all he's read.

And then he's probably read the letter from the GBI, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. But let's remember that letter is deeply the product of Georgia politics.

It comes out of the feud between Trump and Kemp. It comes out of the battle in which Trump weighed in on behalf of Purdue against Kemp, Raffenburg is kind of a totty or assistant.

He's part of the Kemp, you know, Georgia machine. So all of that should be read very carefully and also skeptically. All right, that's enough of that for Barr.

Interestingly, Alan Dershowitz weighs it weighed in. And I've only seen a couple of clips. I haven't actually watched the full Dershowitz analysis. But what really struck me from what I've seen is he appears to be sort of trying to take this middle stance, which is very appealing rhetorically for any kind of an analyst.

It's sort of like there are extremes on both sides. And I'm going to occupy the position in the middle, equidistant from the two sides. And this is going to give me a sort of kind of automatic credibility.

Now, it's sometimes is true that you've got extremes on both sides and the middle position is the correct one. But it doesn't always follow.

And with Dershowitz, the extremes that he's talking about here are well, and the one hand he's talking about the extreme of the movie. Supposedly, the movie is driven by making the extreme claim that the election could have gone the other way.

But what's the other extreme? Well, for him, the other extreme is the January 6th committee. So it's almost like those guys are excessive and then the movie is excessive. But there's a huge difference.

The January 6th committee is putting out this kind of, you could almost call it propaganda display, refusing to engage with its critics, not answering any objections, selectively editing evidence, editing even Trump's tweets. But I'm not doing that.

...