If Lynette Hooker accidentally fell from the dingy, why do the reported GPS and electronic tracking data appear to conflict with Brian Hooker's original

account of where and when the incident occurred?

I'm a retired NYPD sergeant on police off the cuff.

We analyze cases the way cops and prosecutors do, what matters, what doesn't, and what the

internet gets wrong.

If that's a perspective you want, subscribe now because this is an entertainment.

It's experience, folks.

You know, I'd just like to let everyone know that the police off the cuff podcast is sponsored by Van Duel on the Believe Network.

We have a really interesting show today.

Some happening, some new happenings in the

Net Hooker case. And we're going to talk about that today. But first, folks, hold on to your hats,

hold on to your loved ones, hold on to your cup of coffee, hold on to your service dog.

And as someone asked me to say the other day, the equal time. Hold on to your service cat.

You're about to enter true crime from a police perspective.

You're about to enter the off-the-cuff zone.

The police off-the-cuff zone.

That has to be some common sense.

They were the ones who called 911 to get them help, and now they're calling to change.

You know, one of the first question that I asked in my intro to this show was if the, it's true that that Lynette Hooker fell off that dingy, right? If Lynette Hooker accidentally fell from the dinghy,

why do reported GPS and electronic tracking data appear to conflict with Brian Hooker's original account

of where and when the incident occurred? Well, there's only one answer to that.

He's lying.

...