Book your ticket to happiness with Sun Express Airlines. This is the Friends of History Debating Society. I am Gaius John Bachelor.

Germanicus Michael Leos, we're by the Thames.

It's a beautiful spring day.

We're off to see theater tonight, a theater piece, after sacrificing to Augustus.

We're reflecting, however, on the direction of war fighting in the 21st century. Nuclear weapons are part of the conversation.

Deployed to Belarus the front line of NATO, Russian Federation.

Deployed to Sussex, England, we're told, front line of Russian NATO confrontation.

Headlines out of Europe, Europe must do the

do the

do the planning is the quote

and reconsider defense capabilities in the last week we've had the final confirmation

that Sweden joins NATO. Again and again the Baltic states say, after Ukraine, he's coming for us. We know that Finland and Sweden are

taking their responsibilities of the northern flank of NATO very seriously. We know that Romania is most worried about Moldova, which is just

across the Daniel from Romania. We do know that Poland is ready, even Donald Tusk, the new, former but new,

leader of Poland is ready to militarize even the more, and NATO is a militarized camp right now.

And then we have NATO itself.

The question is raised about how it's participating in Ukraine war and how it's preparing for what comes

after Ukraine war.

Mr. McCrone says troops, Mr. Schulz says no troops, Mr. Schulz says no troops, Mr. Schull says no Taurus. McCrone and Rishizunak say Storm Shadow.

We're getting total contradictions here. So Dramaticus I turn to you. NATO has an immediate

problem. It's undergoing war exercises right now. The immediate problem is leadership without the U.S.

That's what they're entertaining. They're entertaining the idea of Donald Trump leaving

...