meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Locked On Warriors – Daily Podcast On The Golden State Warriors

LOCKED ON WARRIORS — January 25, 2017 — Emailbag

Locked On Warriors – Daily Podcast On The Golden State Warriors

Locked On Podcast Network, Charles T Hamilton

Warriors Nba, Warriors, Warriors Basketball, Basketball, Sports, Warriors Podcast, Warriors News, Golden State Warriors, Daily Podcast, Warriors Today, Golden State Warriors Podcast, Basketball Podcast, Nba, Warriors Highlights, Podcast, Nba Podcast, Sports Podcast, Golden State, Warriors Game, Golden State Nba

3642 Ratings

🗓️ 25 January 2017

⏱️ 29 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Host Danny Leroux (@DannyLeroux) answers listener questions about Steph Curry being fouled, Curry/Durant pick and rolls, McCaw's development and much more. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You're a locked-on warriors, your daily Golden State Warriors podcast. I am Danny Lur, your host,

0:04.4

and so happy to bring you your team every day. With the Warriors having an off day before their game

0:09.8

in Charlotte after the lost the Miami Heat, I wanted to do an email bag to catch up on some of the

0:16.0

questions that had been asked at various points. If you want to ask more questions, you can reach out to me,

0:20.8

Danny Leroo, NBA, at gmail.com. And I will not include the questioners because I did not ask for

0:26.9

their permission in terms of that. So if somebody, if you want me to read your name, then just give me

0:32.0

permission explicitly in the email. I'm a lawyer, so I'm very anal about this sort of thing. And the questions are from all over time periods.

0:38.1

I just keep a Google doc of various things that I've been asked. Some of them end up getting answered by

0:42.7

context, but I, of course, will not do those on this show. The first question is about flagrant fouls

0:49.1

and protecting Stefan Curry, and I'm always going to shorten the questions because emails are a little

0:53.4

bit longer.

0:58.5

We've seen a lot of flagrants called lately to protect stars, but Steph Curry gets whacked after shots all the time, and they included various examples. And the rule for a flagrant foul is,

1:04.4

I'll read it verbatim. If contact committed against a player with or without the ball is interpreted

1:09.0

to be unnecessary, a flagrant will be

1:11.5

assessed. And that's a flagrant one. It's unnecessary and excessive for a flagrant too. They're not

1:18.0

explicitly in the rule, in that part of the rule, but generally speaking, there's also the idea

1:22.9

of potential for injury. And many will hear that and say, well, yeah, going into a guy, especially after he

1:29.5

shoots, is that potential. And it can be at moments, but really it's hard to say that from a ref's

1:36.5

perspective when you're thinking about it in the heat of the moment, that that wasn't in the,

1:40.2

like, in the scope of trying to get a block or something like that. Most players are at least competent enough if they're going to give a player a hit in that context to do it in the scope of trying to get a block or something like that. Most players are at least

1:44.3

competent enough if they're going to give a player a hit in that context to do it in the form of

1:48.3

something that at least ostensibly looks like a contest. When they don't even have that,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Locked On Podcast Network, Charles T Hamilton, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Locked On Podcast Network, Charles T Hamilton and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.