LIVE: The Spectator’s Alternative Covid Inquiry
Best of the Spectator
The Spectator
4.3 • 826 Ratings
🗓️ 1 March 2026
⏱️ 53 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
As the official Covid Inquiry comes to an end, the Spectator has convened a panel of our own experts to ask the questions that the Inquiry didn’t – or wouldn’t – answer. The Spectator’s commissioning editor Lara Brown is joined by science writer and Conservative peer Matt Ridley, Oxford professor of theoretical epidemiology Sunetra Gupta, former Supreme Court judge Jonathan Sumption, journalist Christopher Snowdon and science writer Tom Whipple.
This is a condensed version of the event. Subscribers can access the full event via Spectator TV and you can find more events from the Spectator here.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello and welcome to a special Saturday edition of Coffee House Shots. |
| 0:07.9 | Now, in fact, this is an extra, extra special edition because you will be hearing the abridged audio from an event that the spectator did earlier this week called the Alternative COVID Inquiry. |
| 0:18.0 | Now, as the official COVID inquiry finally comes to an end, we got |
| 0:22.6 | together a group of experts to discuss some of the big outstanding questions. Questions like, |
| 0:28.0 | did lockdowns actually work? Were they ever justified? Was the government's response lawful? |
| 0:33.3 | And did the scientists get everything right? And perhaps most importantly, how do we go about |
| 0:38.0 | insulating ourselves for the next eventual pandemic? Now, this discussion that you're going to be |
| 0:42.6 | hearing was chaired by the spectators commissioning editor, Lara Brown, and she was joined by |
| 0:47.3 | the science writer and journalist Matt Ridley, Professor of Theoretical Epidemiology at the |
| 0:52.0 | University of Oxford, Sinatra Gupta. |
| 0:57.6 | There was also Jonathan Sumpion, writer and former Supreme Court Justice. |
| 1:04.1 | Christopher Snowden, IEA journalist, and Tom Whipple, the science writer and special correspondent at the Times. |
| 1:08.0 | Now, we pick up the event, as each panelist was making their opening statements, |
| 1:10.2 | so we will begin with Jonathan Sumpson. |
| 1:16.3 | This evening shouldn't really be necessary. The reason why it is, is that the patent inadequacy of the reports so far produced by the official inquiry at great public expense. |
| 1:22.6 | But Lady Hallett has retraced in minute detail the inadequacies of the decision-makers, but |
| 1:29.7 | has said remarkably little about the inadequacy of their decisions. She takes at face value models |
| 1:37.0 | like those of Professor Ferguson based on completely unrealistic assumptions about human behavior |
| 1:44.0 | and treats them as accurate statements of fact. |
| 1:47.8 | She ignores the experience of other places which declined to impose draconian remedies that had been chosen by the UK. |
| 1:56.1 | She doesn't address the many authoritative studies which show that there is no significant correlation |
| 2:02.6 | between the severity of non-pharmaceutical interventions and mortality. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

