4.6 • 635 Ratings
🗓️ 25 June 2022
⏱️ 6 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
As much as abortion has been indefensible on constitutional grounds, the real monstrosity of Roe was not legal but moral. For 50 years the two sides of the debate have been called “pro-choice” and “pro-life,” and those are accurate labels. The ability to freely terminate a pregnancy—at any point in the pregnancy and for any reason—is certainly about the right to make a choice. But that invented constitutional right has been, even more fundamentally, about the ending of life. Everyone with eyes to see the literal pictures of beating hearts and 4D ultrasounds, not to mention the gruesome photos of preborn children torn limb from limb, has known that we are talking about life.
In this episode of Life and Books and Everything, Kevin reads from an article he wrote for WORLD Opinions following the historic overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Welcome back to life and books and everything. I'm Kevin DeYoung. |
0:16.8 | Today I want to read this article from World Opinions upon the momentous occasion, nearly 50 years in the making of the overturning of Roe v. Wade with the Dobbs decision that the Supreme Court handed down on June 24. Here's my piece entitled, Let the Little Children Come to Me. |
0:40.7 | Roe v. Wade was always an embarrassment of contorted jurisprudence. Even many legal scholars on the |
0:47.1 | left admitted as much. The Constitution never meant to enshrine under the right of privacy |
0:52.4 | or the due process clause, a right to abortion |
0:55.6 | on demand. Indeed, as Justice Samuel Alito's opinion points out, at the time of the 14th Amendment, |
1:01.6 | three-quarters of the states outlawed abortion at every stage of pregnancy, and the remaining |
1:06.4 | states soon followed suit. The Dobbs' decision succeeds admirably in making the fictitious reasoning |
1:13.1 | of Roe plain to see. But as much as abortion has been indefensible on constitutional grounds, |
1:19.9 | the real monstrosity of Roe was not legal, but moral. For 50 years, the two sides of the debate |
1:26.3 | have been called pro-choice and pro-life. |
1:29.5 | And those are accurate labels. |
1:31.6 | The ability to freely terminate a pregnancy at any point in the pregnancy and for any reason |
1:36.7 | is certainly about the right to make a choice. |
1:40.7 | But that invented constitutional right has been, even more fundamentally, about the ending of life. |
1:47.6 | Everyone with eyes to see the literal pictures of beating hearts and 4D ultrasounds, |
1:53.7 | not to mention the gruesome photos of pre-born children torn limb from limb, |
1:58.2 | has known that we are talking about life. |
2:04.0 | The newborn baby lovingly cuddled for the first time and welcomed into the world with tears of joy is the same child who has been denied a right |
2:09.8 | to live a few inches away on the other side of the birth canal. Father forgive us, for we know what we do. |
2:20.5 | No doubt parents have always loved their children, |
2:26.9 | but the world didn't collectively protect children until the hitherto strange views of Jews and Christians became normalized. If there was one dominant fact regarding children in the ancient world, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Clearly Reformed, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Clearly Reformed and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.