Well, howdy there, Internet people, it's Bell again.

So today, we're going to talk about Trump's Iran strategy.

In a recent video, I made the apparently unforgivable mistake of requesting an exit strategy

and definable objectives before any campaign commences. That leads us to a question that came in,

that, while not phrased in the most polite way, is worth going over. Quote,

Corporal, word that starts with C, he said his military objective. Iran can't have a nuke.

And he didn't say it outright, but he made it clear that if he didn't get that, then he'd remove the supreme leader.

And then we'll let the Iranian people deal with it after he's gone.

How hard is this to understand?

Maybe stick to your lane.

How hard is it to understand? Maybe stick to your lane. How hard is it to understand? Well, Iran can't have a nuke isn't a military objective. Sure, degrade capacity for them to manufacture a nuke,

but since U.S. Intel estimates say they weren't actively pursuing one, I'm not sure what you mean.

If he doesn't get it, he'll remove the supreme leader.

Okay, targeting command and control is actually a definable objective.

But that next part of your plan is why I asked about an exit plan.

You say, we'll let the Iranian people deal with it after he's gone.

So I want to make sure I've got this right.

In some quest for WMDs based on questionable intel, we're going to engage in a military operation in the Middle East.

Take out the central government in a quick fashion, with no separate power structure in place,

and just let the chips fall where they may. I've seen this one before. It actually didn't go well.

Saying you're going to take out the government and let the

local population sort it out isn't a strategy. It's a wish. In Iran, who do you think the most

...