Well, howdy there internet people, let's bow again. So today we are going to talk

about former President Trump and a social media post, the US Constitution, we'll talk about Liz Cheney, and of

course there will end up being a tie-back to the recent Supreme Court decision concerning how the president is, well, I mean,

what's the word, basically like kind of above the law when it comes to immunity.

Okay, so over on Trump's little social media site, a meme was being circulated.

Elizabeth Lynn Cheney is guilty of treason.

Retruth if you want televised military tribunals. Now over there, retruth, that means to share it.

Trump retruth it.

Yeah. retruthed it. Yeah, okay, so I mean that's some unique rhetoric coming

from somebody seeking the immunity of the Oval Office.

But I would point something out, okay?

At one point in time, Trump,

he swore an oath to preserve, protect, and defend a document, the US Constitution.

In that document it actually outlines what treason is in the United States and

it shall only consist of levying war. I feel like I would remember if Liz Cheney

had done that. It seems like something that would like

stick out in my mind a little bit. And I know somebody's going to say, well it also

says, you know, adhering to the enemies, aid and comfort yeah sure let's just go ahead

and take whatever act whatever political act you're going to frame as

as providing aid and comfort and adhering and just ask the questions that will go along with it.

As far as whatever perceived enemy you're talking about it,

when it comes to US doctrine, is that enemy a greater

...