Well, howdy there internet people, it's Bow again. So today we are going to talk

about Trump and a social media post and some recent information that the

former president received and the possible outcomes from

his more recent actions.

Okay, so if you don't know recently, I want to say Friday, the former president was basically

warned about his social media content, the posts that he was putting out, and how they could be perceived

as intimidating, threatening, or an attempt to influence the jury pool, things like that, because of things, because of

post he had already made. The judge in DC was super clear about this and indicated that those types of

posts would be something that would induce her, induce the judge to schedule an early trial date, to attempt

to limit the amount of damage he could do by attempting to influence the jury pool.

Friday.

So today, Sunday, Trump post an image of somebody else's post.

And that post contained a photo of the judge and described her as an Obama left-wing activist

judge in D.C. whose husband also got appointed by Obama as a DC judge

openly admitted she's running election interference against Trump.

I mean I haven't checked everything that this judge has said but I'm fairly certain that that is not something she has said.

I don't believe that she has openly admitted anything of the sort, and honestly that seems a little defamatory to me but more importantly

This is something that could definitely be perceived as attempting to influence the jury pool. Now undoubtedly

Trump's argument here is going to be that he didn't actually make the post.

He just took an image of the post and put it on his stuff.

He didn't actually say that. Somebody else said that. I mean sure I

get it. That's that's the only defense I can see for this. Maybe there's another but it's the only defense I can see for this maybe there's another but it's the only

...