Well, howdy there, internet people, let's bow again. So today we are going to talk about

loyalty and pledges and oaths and Aisa Hutchinson and the Republican Party

because Hutchinson had some questions.

You know the Republican Party they want any candidate who is going to be on the debate stage

running for president they want them to sign a pledge, take an oath that says they are going to support the

eventual nominee.

Given one candidate's legal entanglements, well Hutchinson had questions and according to the

reporting the Republican Party was just like tough. If you want to be on the debate stage you have to take this

oath. You have to sign this pledge to remain loyal to whoever the nominee is.

I mean, I understand where Hutchinson's coming from on this one.

It makes a whole lot of sense.

He was seeking some kind of clarification, an amendment,

because he believed it to just be inconceivable that the

Republican Party would demand that he remain loyal to somebody who might be convicted under the Espionage Act.

He said, I'm not going to vote for him if he's a convicted felon. I'm not going to vote for him if he's

convicted of espionage and I'm not going to vote for him if he's convicted of

other serious crimes.

And I'm not going to support him.

They need to put a little rationality

to what is said in that oath or that pledge. I mean, it makes sense right the ultimate irony being of course that if pledges

oaths and loyalty meant anything to trump,

this conversation wouldn't be taking place.

...