Well, howdy there internet people, let's bow again. So today we are going to talk about France and Ukraine and instructors and sheep. Well, really the lack of sheep.

really the lack of sheep because that's what's interesting.

And that part isn't really being talked about in the coverage

and it's the most important part because it gives

us some insight beyond just the news.

So if you miss the news, France has indicated that they will be sending instructors to Ukraine.

The news also suggests that there are other members of NATO that are considering it,

and the rumor mill says there's even more that are considering it than what's mentioned in the coverage.

Now, the fact that instructors, advisors, observers,

whatever you want to call them,

might be headed to Ukraine,

that's not interesting because realistically that's probably

been happening ever since the quote international volunteers started showing up. We talked about it at the time because that was the

perfect cover to send covert forces into Ukraine to assist. Would never be

admitted, you can't prove that despite some less than ideal

statements from military brass, that's not something you're going to be able to

prove. But odds are That's not something you're going to be able to prove

But odds are as soon as the international volunteers started showing up and there was that giant PR Blitz talking about them. From that point forward you had covert Western

forces helping in Ukraine. The interesting part is not that France is looking at doing this or is doing this.

It's that they're not sheep dipped.

Sheep dip is a term. It has nothing to do with sheep, nothing to do with

dipping sheep into something, and nothing to do with agriculture,

...