Well, howdy there internet people, let's bow again.

So today we're going to talk about a tale of two assistants and Trump.

And two instances of somebody close to Trump saying something that is incredibly

problematic for the former president. This is definitely information you're going to see again.

Okay, so we will start with the Georgia case.

Jeffrey Clark during Trump's time, DOJ.

So he, like Meadows, trying to get his case removed

from the state of Georgia and taken to federal court.

The argument that was made by his attorneys was basically, hey, he was in DOJ, acting in his

role, and everything he did was at the direction of Trump. We're probably going to hear those words again.

The judge, when it comes to the removal, the judge seemed skeptical, but did not rule on it immediately.

When you're talking about a wide-ranging case like the one that's happening in Georgia.

A defense attorney does not want to hear

that another defendant

said that everything they did was at the direction of their client.

That's bad news for a defense team.

So we'll see that information again one way or another

and that's kind of a major development that's one of those things that is

could alter the outcome of a case as it proceeds. Now the other thing has to do with the documents case.

The reporting says that an assistant to Trump was told by Trump, you don't know anything about those boxes, something along

those lines.

You don't know about the boxes, you don't know anything about the boxes something like

...