The following podcast contains advertising to access an ad-free version of the LawFair

podcast become a material supporter of LawFair at patreon.com slash LawFair.

That's patreon.com slash LawFair.

Also, check out LawFair's other podcast offerings, rational security, chatter, LawFair

no bull and the aftermath.

If impeachment is about deterrence, then it should deter a president for the entire term.

Rather than say, if you do something wrong, if you commit a high-crime or misdemeanor

and it's early enough in your term, then you're going to face consequences for it, including

disqualification.

But hey, if you wait until the end of the term, then you can do whatever you want and

we can't do anything about it.

That doesn't seem like the structure of the framers thought they were setting up and

that that's important going forward when we talked about impeachment maybe not happening

until the person is gone.

If when Bill Clinton on his last day pardon Mark Rich, if that had turned out to be a pardon

for a bribe, that might have been worth impeaching.

So we've got to keep that deterrent effect that is at the core of what impeachment is

all about going all the way to January 20th.

I'm Jack Goldsmith and this is the LawFair podcast, January 13th, 2021.

I sat down with Brian Colt, a law professor at Michigan State University to talk about

an important issue in the news this week, late impeachments.

In the current context, the issue of a late impeachment would arise if the House of Representatives

...