I assume there's no hesitation going for two in that situation.

No, yeah, right going into the overtime spot, I thought that would be the way that we would go.

I kind of think of that as like a third possession in a way, David, to say, if you get on D and you go, you can tie or you can go.

And, you know, like, that's the way.

If you tie, you got to stop and get it back again. So that was the strategy all along. And honestly, it was the play that we liked, you know, we got to bat it down. But against a man to man, that's one that we practiced a lot and we liked it. And so, you know, I hate the outcome, but like there was no hesitation.

No, I knew before the drive started,

like, hey, we're gonna score,

we're gonna go for two.

Then you're in all four down territory, so it's more strategy in that way.

So I'll get to what I thought about the decision to go for two.

I preferred it. I thought it was the right

call, but it wasn't like a no-brainer. There's a lot to consider there. And I think if those

of you that felt like they should have kicked with two minutes and 47 seconds left, I think

that there is a case that you can make for that. I'll share that with you coming up in a bit.

All right, we are at that point

where I'm listing the things I didn't like the bad from the game because there was so much good,

which we went through. I started it with, you know, they just don't get enough consistent pass rush.

And they probably won't, you know, this year, unless they're playing bad, you know, teams and bad

quarterbacks. Like, you may get a bad quarterback and a bad team on Sunday in Minnesota offensively.

Now, Brian Flauers in that defense, that's legit, but offensively, I mean, finally, back to the

quarterbacks they faced last year, you know?

So I didn't like the end of the first half.

...