So, guys, Derek, more plates, more dates.com. Today we're going to be talking about John Skywalker's

recent cycle post. So he basically outlined exactly what he's taking, which commendable for that.

Most people will not even say they're on gear, let alone post their full protocol for everyone to judge.

And then, you know, look at your physique and say and say oh you don't look good enough for the

amount of gear you take and shit like that which is what people always fucking do so good like kudos

to him for doing that and staying uh keeping it real on that front um his stack basically posted

july 30th decided against trend that shit's too toxic to be honest.

Also five times more endrogenic than test.

So that is a common myth.

It is not five times more androgenic than test despite on the

Anabolic to Endrogenic Ratings Chart that you always see permeated throughout the community.

It's showing a 500 to 500 antibiotic to endic rating when in reality it's more tissue selective than

testosterone there's a reason it was prescribed to women decades ago it's not

because it was more androgenic than testosterone I assure you that so it's not five

times more endrogenic than tests first of all that's a huge myth which I have

dispelled in my previous videos and I compel you to go check out some of my old

why trend below works better than other steroids in a calorie deficit video or

my trembleau dosage video if you actually want to see the clinical application to

it when it was dosed at in a therapeutic context, but just for the record, it's more tissue selective, anabolic to endogenic wise than testosterone. So that is incorrect. It says which can really fuck your receptors up if you abuse. So its tissue selectivity has nothing to do with its effect on the receptor.

It's progestogenic in nature,

so it does inherently have its own satellite interaction with other receptors

that make it a bit more complicated of a hormone to leverage effectively and predictably.

...