meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Psychology In Seattle Podcast

Johnny Depp v Amber Heard #6 & #7

Psychology In Seattle Podcast

Kirk Honda

Mental Health, Health & Fitness

4.61.2K Ratings

🗓️ 11 May 2022

⏱️ 40 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Dr. Kirk Honda reacts to the Johnny Depp v Amber Heard trial.

Get up to 16 free meals from Hello Fresh here: www.HelloFresh.com/Seattle16

image: GabboT, CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

Become a patron: https://www.patreon.com/PsychologyInSeattle
Email: https://www.psychologyinseattle.com/contact
Get merch: https://teespring.com/stores/psychology-in-seattle
Dr. Kirk’s Cameo: https://www.cameo.com/kirkhonda
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/psychologyinseattle/
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/PsychologyInSeattle/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/PsychInSeattle
Facebook Official Page: https://www.facebook.com/PsychologyInSeattle/
Facebook Fan Page (run by fans): https://www.facebook.com/groups/112633189213033

The Psychology In Seattle Podcast ®

Trigger Warning: This episode may include topics such as assault, trauma, and discrimination. If necessary, listeners are encouraged to refrain from listening and care for their safety and well-being.

Disclaimer: The content provided is for educational, informational, and entertainment purposes only. Nothing here constitutes personal or professional consultation, therapy, diagnosis, or creates a counselor-client relationship. Topics discussed may generate differing points of view. If you participate (by being a guest, submitting a question, or commenting) you must do so with the knowledge that we cannot control reactions or responses from others, which may not agree with you or feel unfair. Your participation on this site is at your own risk, accepting full responsibility for any liability or harm that may result. Anything you write here may be used for discussion or endorsement of the podcast. Opinions and views expressed by the host and guest hosts are personal views. Although, we take precautions and fact check, they should not be considered facts and the opinions may change. Opinions posted by participants (such as comments) are not those of the hosts. Readers should not rely on any information found here and should perform due diligence before taking any action. For a more extensive description of factors for you to consider, please see www.psychologyinseattle.com

This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/3269717/advertisement

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hey dessert listeners, let's watch the trial. Let's do it also very kind patient loving gentle

0:06.9

man. And our mom was the opposite. She was very high strong, very nervous, anxiety,

0:14.1

angry. Alright, so we're learning from Johnny Depp's older sister. She's two years older than him.

0:20.4

We're learning that there were four kids in the family and they were the two youngest and they

0:24.9

had two older siblings that were a lot older. We're also learning from her. The father was very nice

0:31.6

and accommodating and the mom was abusive and anxious and emotionally erratic. We also heard from her

0:40.5

that Johnny Depp as a kid was kind of a clown, kind of a prankster, very caring and warm and fun

0:47.6

as a kid. So they were completely opposite people. Did your mother Betty ever get angry with your

0:53.3

father? Yes. How would your mother express her anger toward your father? Mom would she would scream,

1:02.3

she would yell at him, she would hit him. It's interesting. I think it's tangentially related to this

1:08.6

case. I mean the jury is there to decide whether or not Amber heard is guilty of defamation, whether

1:15.3

she essentially lied and harmed his career. And by the way I didn't react to all the other

1:22.4

opening statements because I felt like they were, it was like an introductory paragraph and I was

1:28.5

like, well, I don't know, well wait until the evidence come out. This seems like there's going to be

1:32.4

a lot of evidence that are going to go over. And I will say that in summary of Amber heard

1:38.4

teams lawyers, the lawyer was saying to the jury, you're not here to decide upon who was the bad guy,

1:44.6

who was the abusive one. You're here to decide on the first amendment on freedom of speech that

1:49.9

Amber heard in her statement that she made to the Washington Post has every right to have said what

1:55.2

she said. And there's nothing wrong with what she said. They actually read the entire statement,

2:00.5

the entire piece, which I think I remember reading in the past, but it's not a lot about Johnny

2:05.3

Depp, but you could argue that the the most salacious detail in there, which isn't elaborately discussed

2:12.0

is the implication, the very obvious implication that Johnny Depp is abusive. I don't know. When I hear

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Kirk Honda, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Kirk Honda and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.