Yo Parishrofins and Retrogrades.

I'm back with Joe Enders to respond to Catholic answers, specifically Joe Heschmeier, who refused to debate us.

Joe Heschmiya, you can call in and do whatever you want to do.

You can Skype in.

We'd love to have you.

On the series of videos, I hate doing this back and forth video,

video, because it allows hiding and obfuscation. Joe Enders and I have just been showing very, very, very, very, very, very clearly that when Joe Heschmeier and Catholic Answers cited two

examples of an errant interpretation of wifely submission, one was the even more feminist

than them version of feminism. that of course we said nothing about

because they're trying to split the difference and be half feminist i'm going to talk about that

in a second but when he took the correct version of a wife a woman who says i'm trying to be

silent i'm trying to do what my husband tells me to do. If he wants to buy a car,

I'm silently going along with it. And he said in his first video, Joe Heschmires, that this was wrong,

that this was an errant interpretation of Ephesians 5. It's not the Christian rule of faith for wives

to silently do what their husbands have said

to do prudentially, which is the entire game when it comes to wifely submission.

If a husband has no authority, if his wife doesn't have to take his prudential authority,

we're going to just cite the catechism and everything out the wazoo.

Joe Enders, your back.

What's up?

Say whatever you want to say opening shot here.

No, I mean, the entire, like, he seems to have taken this personally.

...