I didn't know.

That would sound like a really weird thing to say.

But, you know, when you don't have a lot to work with, you've got to throw something in the air.

Throw something against the wall.

See what sticks.

Remember, as you mean, Phil, no, all you need is to get one juror to say,

ah, maybe just maybe, you know, he, he, uh, he didn't do it. But the thing is,

you'd have to get that juror to believe that on each and every count of SA. And I'm not sure

if you can do that. But, uh, any defense attorney is going to have a hell of a time

with this case because it's really hard because this is an electronic case. It's not questionable

witnesses at 3 o'clock in the morning, some of whom may have been drunk, some of whom may have been

high on narcotics or questionable criminal backgrounds whom may have been drunk, some of whom may have been high on narcotics

or questionable criminal backgrounds that may have seen something. No, this is a very, very

straightforward case. I wouldn't want to be a criminal defense attorney on this case because

I don't think I could do a good job on this whatsoever. Absolutely not. Eve Phelps from the chat, people have a very

hard time understanding that women can be abusers too and can hate their children, but they can

and do. Eve, I think you're right. And I'm, you know, I'm baffled in a way that Jennifer Soto has not yet been charged.

And I've been attacked from the beginning for taking that position.

Not very much anymore because I think more and more people came to my way of thinking

as they see.

And I mentioned the word omission.

Just simply by omission, she could be charged.

...