Hello and welcome back to Sociology 101, where God's glorified most by his love and provision for all people.

Today we're going to go through a broadcast with Dr. James White, who just recently

did a broadcast, actually did two different broadcast in the last week, both of which he

addresses me and provisionism in direct directly and one of them and then indirectly through a question

and the other. And as we've said before, we're only going to respond to Dr. White when he brings us up.

We've been doing that for the last two years.

People talk about being obsessed and all these kinds of things with Dr. White.

And I've said before, I think it's a really healthy engagement as long as we can remain cordial.

On our side of things, I think we've maintained that. I think Dr.

White provides a good foil for us for a lack of better word there in order to see side by side the two different perspectives.

And what you're going to hear from Dr. White here really is a clear concise contrast to what provisionism teaches and some conflations.

We've talked about before what a conflation is. It's when you're a categorical error is often made.

I made this point on Twitter the other day and then Dr. White almost perfectly demonstrates it the very next day after I tweeted this out.

Here's the tweet if you want to look at it here.

Let's see if I can put it into the screen.

Let's see.

I'm not sure.

There it goes.

Right there.

One of Calvinism's most common categorical errors is making the free will versus determinism

debate into a free will versus bondage to sin debate. One can be in bondage to sin and still be

freely, libertarianly freely able to respond positively to God's own appeals to come so as to be

...