Israel has invaded Syria in a blatant act of illegal aggression.

Why isn't this fact being plastered all over the Western media?

Why isn't this fact being condemned by Western politicians?

Well, the answer for that speaks for itself.

Israel, of course, is treated as being above the law, as having total impunity,

as being able to behave exactly as it wish is invading, occupying,

annexing, colonising. It's not just invading Syria, it is pummeling Syria with bombs in an

attempt to destroy the potential military capacity of any new Syrian state, clearly treating any new post-Assad government as

inevitably hostile to Israeli interests as it is seen by Israel, or they are seen by Israel.

It's reported that Israeli tanks are up to 16 miles away from the Syrian capital, Damascus,

and has certainly gone miles beyond the Golan Heights, into a so-called buffer zone

patrol by the UN. The claim made by Israel is that a disengagement agreement signed between

the Assad regime and the Israeli state in 1974 has now collapsed. An agreement it should be noted

that the Syrian regime has refused to challenge in that half a century. That's

despite the fact that the Golan Heights is illegally occupied by the Israeli state. It is Syrian land.

It belongs to Syria and indeed the Syrian people and which any new Syrian government should

demand is returned to Syria. What Israel is doing is invading Syria

for the transparent reason of annexing yet more land. This is their habit. They claim the

Israeli state, they need a buffer zone. Then that buffer zone becomes permanently occupied, land

they settle. Then they demand yet another further buffer zone to protect what they already

stole and then guess what happens then to that buffer zone.

You guessed it, the Israeli state steals it, occupies it, de facto annexes it, and colonizes it.

...