meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
SANS Internet Stormcenter Daily Cyber Security Podcast (Stormcast)

ISC StormCast for Monday, July 17th, 2023

SANS Internet Stormcenter Daily Cyber Security Podcast (Stormcast)

SANS ISC Handlers

Tech News, News

4.9754 Ratings

🗓️ 17 July 2023

⏱️ 7 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Daily 5 min cyber security news summary. News, patches, vulnerabilities and trends in information and network security. MSFT Driver Certs Details; Threads Threats; CVSS 4.0 Preview

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome to the Monday, July 17th, 2003 edition of the Sandinut Storm Center's Stormcast. My name is Johannes Ulrich and the time recording from Jacksonville, Florida.

0:14.7

To start out, I just want to follow up a little bit on last week's patch Tuesday. Cisco has a blog post that was released last

0:23.7

Tuesday, but I don't think I mentioned it yet, that goes to a little bit more depth on these

0:29.2

kernel mode driver signing issue that Microsoft addressed last Tuesday. To support legacy systems,

0:37.3

Microsoft will accept cross-signed kernel mode drivers as long as the signature timestamp is set to a date before July 29, 2015.

0:48.3

And that's the real problem here, that there is sort of this fallback. So an attacker who somehow has obtained a signing

0:57.4

certificate that was valid back in 2015, well, they can now just backdate the signature.

1:04.0

Cisco also states that they observed over a dozen of code signing certificates that are often

1:09.7

being distributed as part of tools to create

1:12.4

these fake certificates.

1:15.6

This is available on GitHub.

1:19.6

The blog post also suggests that thousands of malicious drivers are taking advantage of

1:25.7

this particular problem.

1:27.9

The underlying vulnerability actually also still exists.

1:31.6

Microsoft only added known exploited signing certificates to a block list.

1:37.8

So these are like the ones that Cisco found on GitHub.

1:41.1

According to Cisco, it can be helpful to compare the compilation date of a driver

1:47.6

to the signature date.

1:48.9

If it was signed before it was compiled, well, then you probably have a problem.

1:55.1

But of course, that date can be faked too.

2:00.0

But how do attackers obtain these private keys? Researchers with the

2:05.6

Technical Hochschule in Aachen did analyze over 300 Docker images from DockerUp and about

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from SANS ISC Handlers, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of SANS ISC Handlers and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.