ISC StormCast for Friday, February 24th 2017
SANS Internet Stormcenter Daily Cyber Security Podcast (Stormcast)
SANS ISC Handlers
4.9 • 754 Ratings
🗓️ 24 February 2017
⏱️ 6 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hello, welcome to the Friday, February 24th, 2017 edition of the Sands and its Storm Center's Stormcast. |
| 0:07.3 | My name is Johannes Ulrich, and today I'm recording from Scottsdale, Arizona. |
| 0:12.6 | The big news today comes from researchers who, with the help of Google's computing resources, |
| 0:18.1 | were able to find two collisions for Shaw One. For a few years now, |
| 0:23.6 | it was known that Shah One was on its way out, but still this announcement came somewhat as a |
| 0:29.3 | surprise. It did take quite significant computing resources still to find this particular collision, |
| 0:36.3 | but overall the resources used weren't really |
| 0:40.5 | all that outrageous. The researchers did enumerate it to about $100,000 worth of computing |
| 0:48.0 | time. The problem that killed Sha Wan in the end was not just that computing time has become cheaper and CPUs and |
| 0:57.0 | GPUs have become faster, but also that the algorithm wasn't as strong as originally believed. |
| 1:04.0 | Shah 1 hashes are 80 bits in size, so you would think that you have about 2 to the power |
| 1:10.0 | of 80 different possibilities here that you have about two to the power of 80 different possibilities |
| 1:12.0 | here that you have to consider. But due to some weaknesses discovered in Chabon, in particular |
| 1:19.5 | by the researchers that were part of this collaboration, the actual number of computations being required is closer to the power of 66. |
| 1:33.3 | So that's more than 100,000 times easier than originally believed. |
| 1:40.3 | And these weaknesses in the algorithm, of course, were no news, and they had been announced |
| 1:45.6 | for a while, so this is why Shah-1 was considered on its way out. |
| 1:51.0 | Many browsers with the end of the year did no longer trust certificates signed by |
| 1:57.9 | Shaw-Wan, and of course,, certificate authorities stopped also issuing new certificates |
| 2:03.6 | based on Shah 1 signatures. |
| 2:06.6 | Shah 2, which is based on Shah 256 and Shah 512, is still considered safe enough. |
| 2:14.6 | So signatures now should definitely use these algorithms. However, there are still |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from SANS ISC Handlers, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of SANS ISC Handlers and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

