Is The Golden Age of Small Dollar Online Fundraising Over? (with Michael Cohen and Tom Merritt)
Politics Politics Politics
Justin Robert Young
4.6 • 870 Ratings
🗓️ 8 August 2025
⏱️ 65 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Netanyahu’s latest move isn’t subtle. He wants Israel to take full control of the Gaza Strip — dismantle Hamas, free hostages, and install a non-Hamas civilian government. On paper, it sounds like a decisive endgame. In practice, it’s a minefield. The UN, the UK, and even some of Israel’s own military leaders are warning this could be catastrophic, both humanitarian and legal. We’re talking about tens of thousands of troops pushing into Gaza City, uprooting a million residents to the south, and expanding a controversial aid network that’s already replacing the UN in distribution.
I can’t say I’m shocked. From the moment October 7th happened, this was always one of the plausible end states — Hamas removed from power entirely. What I didn’t anticipate was Iran’s weakened state factoring into the timing, or the fact that Israel might see that as a green light to act more aggressively. The trouble is, any operation that moves into the areas where hostages are held risks killing them outright. That’s going to split Israel politically, because it forces a brutal question: if you were willing to risk their deaths now, why didn’t you do it immediately after the attack?
And that’s before you even get to the problem of what comes after. Hamas leaders can’t make a deal and then just go live quietly in Gaza. They’d have to leave. But where? You don’t walk away from martyrdom rhetoric on Monday and spend Tuesday at Mario World in Orlando. Gaza under Hamas isn’t just a state — it’s a criminal syndicate, and that makes any negotiated exit almost impossible. Which means, if this plan goes forward, it’s going to be bloody, messy, and controversial from the start.
Trump’s Putin Play
Trump’s continuing to signal he’ll meet with Putin “very soon,” possibly in the UAE. Early talk was that Zelensky would be part of a three-way summit, but Trump has apparently dropped that stipulation. Predictably, the Kremlin is treating this like a win, while critics warn it could legitimize Russia’s aggression and undermine NATO. That’s the Beltway framing.
From what I’m hearing, it’s not that simple. Trump has actually been harder on Putin lately than some people realize — moving nuclear subs into range, green-lighting sanctions, and generally signaling that he’s done being strung along. This isn’t 2018 Helsinki. It might be Trump testing whether Putin will only make a deal after feeling genuine pressure.
None of this means a breakthrough is coming. It probably isn’t. But it does mean Trump wants to own the narrative — that he’s the guy who ends wars through direct negotiation. And until Ukraine or Gaza is resolved, his foreign policy record will feel incomplete. I think he knows that, and I think that’s why this meeting’s on the table at all.
FBI Assisting in Locating Texas Dems
In Texas, the Democratic walkout drama is back, with Senator John Cornyn confirming the FBI is helping locate them. Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker is playing host, calling the state’s collection of Democrats “refugees,” which is absurd. They’re not refugees. They’re political props in his own long-term campaign plans.
Here’s the thing — if you believe in what you’re doing, you should want to get arrested. That would make this story bigger, not smaller. It’s the most potent form of protest they’ve got. Instead, they’re hiding out in hotels, funded by Beto O’Rourke’s PAC, doing nothing to energize the very voters they’re supposedly defending.
They could be knocking on doors in the districts that are about to be carved up, rallying people who are about to lose representation. If they got dragged back to Austin by Texas Rangers in the middle of that, it’d be front-page news. Instead, we’ve got photo ops in Chicago. It’s the same mistake they made in 2021 — swapping a real fight for a symbolic one, and then acting surprised when nothing changes.
Chapters
00:00:00 - Intro
00:03:48 - Interview with Michael Cohen and Tom Merritt
00:21:29 - Update
00:21:57 - Gaza
00:29:30 - Trump and Putin
00:32:41 - Texas Dems
00:36:07 - Interview with Michael Cohen and Tom Merritt (con't)
01:01:12 - Wrap-up
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.politicspoliticspolitics.com/subscribe
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | On this edition of the program, the future of tech and politics, Tom Merritt's on. |
| 0:06.1 | Michael D. Cohen's on. |
| 0:07.8 | We're going to blend it all up and show you the future. |
| 0:12.6 | One push notification at a time. |
| 0:15.0 | It's all coming up. |
| 0:19.0 | The following is brought to you by Just Another Pilot. |
| 0:27.1 | Politics, Politics, Politics, Politics. Hello and welcome to the politics program for |
| 0:47.3 | program for Friday, August 8th, 2025, your old pal. |
| 0:58.3 | Justin Robert Young, joining you here in Austin, Texas. Now, actually, I'm recording |
| 1:03.8 | this a little bit early. I'm in Vegas currently. But the conversation we got for you |
| 1:10.4 | is amazing. A lot in the news about the future |
| 1:18.0 | of fundraising. This is something that we are covering here a little bit more than probably |
| 1:22.2 | other political podcasts are covering. Because I genuinely believe that this kind of stuff wins and loses races. |
| 1:30.1 | When you look at the history of advantages, technological advantages, in a close race, it can be the |
| 1:39.8 | difference. Now, sometimes that matters, sometimes that doesn't. But let's just go really, |
| 1:44.1 | really quick |
| 1:44.6 | through the history of this kind of stuff. Republicans in the 70s and 80s were the first to really |
| 1:53.3 | target voters on a very specific level. And the way that they did this was via magazine lists. |
| 2:01.3 | So you might not know whether or not somebody is a Republican or a Democrat or if they |
| 2:06.8 | like your politics or they don't like your politics. But you do know that if they have a |
| 2:11.6 | subscription to guns and ammo, that they're probably going to support somebody who believes |
| 2:17.2 | in the right to bear arms. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Justin Robert Young, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Justin Robert Young and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

