meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Slate News

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts - Is SCOTUS Afraid of Holding Trump to Account?

Slate News

Slate Podcasts

News, News Commentary, Politics

4.5 • 6K Ratings

🗓️ 10 February 2024

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Oral arguments at the Supreme Court Thursday in Trump v. Anderson revealed a lot about some of the justices’ commitment to the primacy of originalism. Noah Bookbinder, president of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, joins Dahlia Lithwick to discuss why his organization took up and pursued the long shot case to try to keep former President Donald J Trump off the ballot in Colorado. While the Supreme Court appeared to have little appetite for taking the big swing to find that Trump had disqualified himself from office when he engaged in an insurrection, Noah insists the case is far from having been in vain - eloquently highlighting the dangerous potential consequences of inaction. It's a chilling reminder of what’s at stake.


Next, Dahlia is joined by slate senior writer Mark Joseph Stern to discuss whether the liberal justices have some grand bargain in mind as they offered multiple off-ramps for Trump’s side, despite dozens of bipartisan briefs arguing for Trump to be kept off the ballot, the court’s originalist’s sudden concern for consequences in this case, when they have had no interest in weighing the life and death consequences for ordinary people in cases concerning guns and abortion. Finally, they tackle a worrying undercurrent to Thursday’s arguments: an apparent capitulation to threats of chaos and violence as a basis for deciding constitutional cases. 


In our Slate Plus segment, Mark sticks around to discuss a landmark gun decision out of the Hawaii Supreme Court, and why it’s a problem that DOJ’s special counsel, Robert Hur, issued a report declining to prosecute, but affirming that Joe Biden is old (hint: the problem isn’t that he’s old). 


Want more Amicus? Subscribe to Slate Plus to immediately unlock exclusive SCOTUS analysis and weekly extended episodes. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Everybody's tendency is to look away from this and pretend it didn't happen.

0:08.0

And one of the functions of this case is it makes it impossible to look away and pretend it didn't happen.

0:15.0

Hi and welcome back to Amicus.

0:20.0

This is Slate's podcast about the Supreme Court, the law, the rule of law, and consequentialist judicial humility.

0:28.0

I am Dahlia Lithwick.

0:30.0

I cover those things for Slate,

0:32.0

although I have to admit that very last beat is quite new for the US Supreme Court.

0:37.0

So the judicial bonkers Palusa of this week week probably peaked the High Court Thursday morning with

0:46.0

well over two hours of oral arguments in what would have been a vacation week in

0:51.2

Trump v Anderson that is of course the Colorado ballot disqualification case.

0:56.0

And we're going to dive right into what happened and didn't happen in those arguments

1:01.0

with Noah Bookbinder.

1:02.0

He's president of citizens for

1:04.7

responsibility and ethics in Washington, better known as crew. They brought this

1:10.2

case on behalf of six Republican and an affiliated Colorado voters and we're going to hear from

1:15.1

NOAA in just a moment. Then we're going to turn to my friend and colleague and fellow

1:20.9

sleep deprived jurisprudence correspondent Mark Joseph Stern to try to figure out how the justices might corral five votes for any sort of off-ramp in this case if that's what they want and whether as our friend professor Rick

1:34.8

Hassan has written this week maybe this sets up some grand bargain for a

1:39.0

Trump loss on the immunity case in the DC circuit and a win in Colorado.

1:44.5

We'll figure that out together.

1:46.2

Then Mark will be back for a Slate Plus segment

1:48.9

to think through a huge Hawaii gun decision. If you are not a Slate Plus member head to Slate.com

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.