Subscribe to The Spectator in our end of lockdown sale and get 10 weeks of the magazine, in print and online, for the price of one.

Not only that, but we'll also send you a bottle of PIMS worth £25, absolutely free.

That's 10 weeks of The Spectator and a bottle of PIMS all for just £4.95.

Hurry, though, this offer ends on Monday 19th of July. Go to spectator.com.

UK forward slash sale. Welcome to Coffeehouse shots for Spectator's Daily Politics Podcast. I'm Fraser Nass.

Earlier today, Henry Dind will be returned with the results of his inquiry into how Britain should be taxing its food.

He was asked two years ago by Michael Gove to consider the wiring behind our food market

and what can be done to make Britain eat healthier.

The conclusions came out today.

He's suggesting basically a tax on salt and a tax on sugar, but formulated in the

same way as the recent tax on sugary drinks, with the hope being that companies substitute the unhealthy

ingredients for healthier ones. So what will the government do about it and what should it do about it?

I'm joined by Kate Andrews and James Forsyth. James, it's funny,

cover of the spectator is the nanny state or nanny Boris today. Doesn't this look like

classic nannying? Because in government, so in opposition, Boris Johnson was talking about

ridiculing these things. He said that if he was in power, he'd tell Jamie Oliver to stuff it and people to eat

what they want. Now we've got Jamie Oliver backing the results of a Dimbledby inquiry, and that

makes fairly, proposes, fairly big intrusions into how people eat and how it's taxed.

Well, Boris Johnson isn't ridiculing the Dimblebee report,

but he's clearly trying to put several kind of port pies of distance

between himself and it, saying today,

after his speech from leveling up,

...