meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Coffee House Shots

Is it right to cut back HS2?

Coffee House Shots

The Spectator

News, Daily News, Politics

4.42.2K Ratings

🗓️ 15 September 2023

⏱️ 12 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The government is reportedly looking into whether it should cut the second phase of HS2. But with so much money having already been pumped into the project, should they just see it through to the end?

Katy Balls speaks to Fraser Nelson and Kate Andrews.

Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.


For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.


Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The spectator combines incisive political analysis with books and arts reviews of Unrivaled Authority.

0:06.1

Subscribe today for just £12 and receive a 12-week subscription in print and online

0:11.7

and get a £20 Amazon gift voucher absolutely free.

0:15.4

Go to spectator.co.uk slash summer.

0:22.8

Hello and welcome to Coffee House Shots,

0:24.5

the spectator's daily politics podcast.

0:26.8

I'm Katie Balls and I'm joined by Kate Andrews and Fraser Nelson.

0:31.1

HS2 is at risk of further cuts to the retenor for the Birmingham as a chance to look for savings.

0:36.9

Kate, talk us through what's happened so far.

0:39.6

So the government is desperate to find some money. It's looking to find money for its day-to-day

0:46.2

spending and also leading up to an election next year. It's looking for some kind of tax cut

0:52.8

and it seems that HS2 is once again on the chopping block because it is a hugely expensive project

1:00.4

where they might be able to find some money where they could divert that to their personal priorities.

1:06.4

I am in two minds about this story. I've real mixed feelings. On the one hand, HS2 is a

1:12.9

disastrous construction project. It should be scrapped. It is billions and billions of pounds

1:18.8

over budget. It is years delayed and by the time it comes online, it's essentially going to be

1:23.9

out of date. This was never the right construction project for the UK and we should not get caught up

1:28.8

in sunk cost fallacy. The fact that money's already been spent is not mean that we should spend

1:32.7

many, many billions more on the project. We should be looking to enhance local infrastructure

1:37.7

and also think about far better technologies for our transport if we really want to go for something

1:41.9

big. But on the flip side of that, you once again have a government that is looking to cut capital

1:48.4

spending so that it can move that part of money into day-to-day spending. This was the theme

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.