This episode is brought to you by Slack. With Slack, you can bring all your people and

tools together in one place. It's your digital HQ where you can increase productivity,

enable flexibility and automate workflows. Plus, Slack is full of game-changing features

like huddles for quick check-ins or Slack Connect, which helps you connect with partners

inside and outside of your company. Slack, where the future works. Get started at

Slack.com slash DHQ. It's a controversial form of ostracism, a tool in bringing down

those with power, cancelling. Some see it as accountability and a method of calling

attention to long-standing injustice. They say it's always been around. Others see a new

very-lin form of mob justice, which jeopardizes a person's safety and risks indefinite alienation.

Either way, in this modern era, social media has a decidedly amplifying effect. It's

against that background. We debate for and against this motion. Cancel culture is toxic.

Hi, everybody. And yes, we are talking about lately what's being called cancel culture,

the perception at least and possibly the reality that there has been an outbreak of people

being punished for the ideas they expressed through a process of public shaming that

has seemed to be silencing them to getting them ejected from positions of prominence even

to ending their careers. There is much disagreement on whether cancel culture is even real or exaggerated

or whether it's really something new and whether it is toxic to public discourse or a necessary

corrective to have these callouts. Cancel culture untrial. That's our debate. I'm John Donvan

and this is Intelligent Squared. All right, everybody. Now, you have a duty to perform

here in this program. And that is to act as the judge of the debate. Each one of you,

what we would like you to do is to tell us which side you feel argued the best. And we're

going to ask you to do that by voting on our motion. Cancel culture is toxic. Before you've

...