We're back with another edition of the Federalist Radio Hour.

I'm Emily Gisinski, culture editor here at the Federalist.

As always, you can email the show at radioatthepederalist.com, follow us on Twitter at FDRLST.

Make sure to subscribe wherever you download your podcasts and to the premium version of our website as well.

Today I'm so happy to be joined by my friend, Nes Stetman, and Nes of course you know

as a senior policy analyst at the Independent Women's Forum where she is also the host of High Noon

and excellent podcast that is Nes, let's every week, right?

It's every week, but every four weeks it's with Emily, so that's why you should listen to it.

Yes, lucky, lucky, lucky listeners just can't get rid of me.

And Nes is also a senior contributor to the Federalist and Nes.

More importantly for the purposes of this conversation, you went to law school

and decided to pour your money down the drain to the University of Virginia.

Yes, yes, that makes me very qualified to talk about Stephen Loans by the way.

That's actually really true. Maybe like the legal commentariat is in this one particular case

extra qualified to talk about the Supreme Court decision on student loans, but I should say,

right at the outset here, the reason I wanted to have Nes on, we were chatting a little bit

back and forth and I realized she was very, very pumped up about the Supreme Court and about

some of the misconceptions about what's just transpired in this last session of the Supreme Court.

We now have another session of the Supreme Court, especially this version of the Supreme Court

post-Trump appointments in the River Mayor and a lot of huge decisions. I mean last year

everybody was focused on dobs. Next year, it's likely everyone's going to be focused on

Chevron, at least based on what we know right now. But in this session, they decided student loans,

...