Hi and welcome to a brush episode of prosecuting Donald Trump.

It's Tuesday, March 12th.

I'm Andrew Weisman, and I'm here with Mary McCord.

I should really say I'm here with,

because we can see each other and we're talking each other,

but you're

gallivanting around. Oh you do some gallivanting too. Sometimes you just have to

work from a different location so that's what I'm doing. Anyway good

morning Andrew. Good morning and we're gonna cut to the That's what I'm doing. Anyway, good morning,

Good morning, and we're going to cut to the chase because there's so much going on.

It is Tuesday morning and lots of topics to get to. So Mary, what's up on your radar screen? I think let's start with and you know you I guess

you can't knock them for trying immunity takes two and three so I think Mr.

Trump's attorneys you know seeing I think what they thought was a good thing,

the delay they're getting by taking their immunity case up to the Supreme Court.

They're trying to get that kind of delay in both the Marilago case as well as the Manhattan case brought by

district attorney Alvin Bragg that is set to go to trial on March 25th. So we'll talk about

this tactic that they're using. So just to be clear that

trial is set to begin two weeks from yesterday. We're also going to talk briefly

about the civil judgments in the two New York cases, the E. Jean Carroll case and the

New York Attorney General's case up to the tune of a half a billion dollars and a bond has been posted now in

connection with one of the judgments in the E. Jean Carroll case and we're going to

talk about that and what kinds of issues that raises and also the fact that within about, as we would say here, a New York minute of posting that bond,

...