Major League Baseball has moved the old-star game out of Atlanta because they don't like

a law that was passed by the legislature. I don't like the law either. But I'm not sure

that was an appropriate occasion for this kind of a boycott. And I worry about boycotts

and the effect it can have on the democratic processes, including the judicial system.

What if a jury were to acquit in the shopping case or come back with a verdict less than

murder? Will we see that kind of boycott as well? Will we see baseball and football and basketball,

moving things out of Minneapolis or Minnesota? And will the jury's decision be influenced or

impacted by the threat of violence, the threat of economic consequences? We'll discuss all of these

issues on the Dirt Show. Hi, welcome to the Dirt Show. The location may look unfamiliar to you

because I've had to come to New York for a few days. So for the next few days we'll be doing the

show from my apartment in New York instead of from the home studio. But the Dirt Show will be the

same. The content will be the same. The background will look a little different. So today is the

second week of the show I'm in trial. Last week was a motion week. This week is science week,

little boring, little tedious, lots of having to establish credentials and background. But we saw

some very interesting testimony this morning from the emergency room doctor who pronounced

George Floyd dead after trying unsuccessfully to resuscitate him. And he testified quite persuasively

that there were no indicia of a drug overdose or a heart attack. Of course, on cross examination and

through other experts, they will be able to establish that the reason there was no indication of a

drug overdose isn't nobody told them about it. And when you're trying to revive somebody and

trying to get his heart beating again, you go in the information you have. Nobody told them

that he had been taking drugs. He didn't know the history and nobody told him that he may have

suffered a heart attack. Look in the end, I think it's very clear what a reasonable jury will conclude

...