We have another case very quickly, somewhat similar in the V-save data.

This is the database.

We all hear how VAERS is inaccurate, VAERS, you know, even though we've argued that it

should have been fixed back when they recognized that it was underreporting by about 1%.

But when COVID vaccine was coming out, they created V-save, which was specifically for

COVID reactions.

Huge database, over a million reports now in their of injuries and adverse events, right?

According to the CDC, over 119 million medical events have been logged in V-save.

Wow.

You know, our federal health authorities have been telling us forever that they have robust

safety systems, cheap among them VAERS.

So it wasn't interesting, wasn't it, that as COVID-19 was about to be rolled out, they

said, um, actually, V-saves, excuse me, VAERS is not really reliable.

We're going to create a new safety system called V-save.

I'm going to set aside what that says about the existing state systems and their promises

about how robust they were for all the other vaccines.

And just talk about V-save.

V-save is basically an app-based program where folks who get the COVID-19 vaccine can report

an injury or some other adverse event.

So as an, if I may also say that one of the things it did by doing that is it probably

depressed the number of reports that would probably have been filed with VAERS.

VAERS is far more complicated to submit to.

...