meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Drilled

How Big Oil Made You Feel Guilty About Climate Change

Drilled

Pushkin Industries

Earth Sciences, True Crime, Science

4.62.4K Ratings

🗓️ 17 May 2021

⏱️ 19 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

A new study from Harvard science historians Naomi Oreskes and Geoffrey Supran points to the use of language targeted specifically to downplay the reality of climate change and shift responsibility entirely onto consumers. Geoffrey Supran, the lead...

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello, welcome to Drill, this is Amy Westerveld. I'm here today with a bit of an update to the

0:17.4

history we chronicled in season 3, when we looked at the last hundred or so years of fossil

0:25.3

fuel propaganda. A new study from a Harvard researchers Jeffrey Supran and Naomi Arezquez highlights

0:32.1

how ExxonMobil in particular has used language both to undermine climate action and to push the

0:38.9

idea that it's an individual consumer problem. Not anything to do with them or the systems they helped

0:46.2

to create and continue to profit from. Lead researcher Jeffrey Supran joined me to talk through

0:52.2

the study's findings and what they mean for climate action more broadly. And what they might

0:58.5

mean for the two dozen or so climate cases making their way through the courts at the moment.

1:03.1

That conversation coming up after this quick break.

1:16.0

So basically if you run a do some code to say what words appear I think within

1:21.7

plus or minus five words of the words climate change and global warming there is literally no word

1:26.8

or phrase that is more common than risk or risks. So it basically became their watchword throughout

1:33.5

throughout the two thousands and likewise in terms of the words the individualized responsibility

1:39.4

all the same keywords pop up regarding meeting the energy demand of consumers you know meeting the

1:45.8

needs all these kinds of words. Did you find that you know the word risk was used to in a way to

1:52.7

introduce doubt like it's a risk but it's not a certainty. Was it that kind of framing or how

1:58.4

how is it being used? Yeah right so essentially they talk about climate risk risks you know long-term

2:07.2

risk potential risk potential long-term risks all permutations on the word risk and our interpretation

2:14.2

is that exon mobile used risk just as they have used other rhetorical cousins like uncertainty

2:21.1

and more research and sound science essentially the same intention of what's sometimes called strategic

2:26.8

ambiguity. It's exactly what the tobacco industry did which is to shift the conversation from

2:36.0

semantics from concepts of reality to concepts of risk and it's a very clever trick because you

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Pushkin Industries, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Pushkin Industries and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.