Welcome to the Advisory Opinions Podcast. This is David Frinch with Sarah Isger.

And if it sounds a little odd, we're both on the road. In undisclosed locations, me

is still somewhere in Northern California. I was at Big Sur yesterday. Sarah, have you

ever been to Big Sur? I have been to Big Sur. It's beautiful. It is amazing. Like it's

gorgeous. Anyway, my adoration and affection for Northern California Geography and Climate

continues unibated. But that's not our topic. We've got a few interesting things to talk

about. We're going to start with a big fourth circuit case, striking down federal prohibitions

against licensed dealers selling handguns to individuals under 21, two adults under 21,

so 18, 19 and 20 year olds. It's an interesting case. It's a long case. It's a, I think, a

141 page opinion. I don't know why it is that the second amendment case is seem to draw

these really long opinions. It's almost seem to include like a complete history of colonial

America, but they really do. So we're going to talk about that. We're going to talk about

the Aveniting, Aveniting prosecution. Sarah has thoughts. We're going to talk about a

Tennessee case involving mandatory posting of a particular kind of signage that to alert

customers if the bathroom is unisex. And it's a compelled speech case, citing drumroll,

please, Sarah. One of my cases from the early 20 teens. So I think when Twitter finds

that out, I'll be in a real trouble. And then we're, if we've got time, we're going to

deal with a little bit of presidential coup plotting scenarios. And we're going to indefinitely

end up with a question to Sarah about the Olympics. So it's a lot. It's a lot. Fourth

circuit strikes down prohibitions. Now, it's not immediate. It doesn't go immediately

into effect. It's not the case that if you're 18 and listening, you can go walk in and

get a handgun right now. But fourth circuit strikes down federal prohibitions on 18-year-olds

...