Welcome to the Advisory Opinions Podcast. This is David French with Sarah Isger and I'm just

telling everybody I sound a little bit different today because I'm on the road. I'm on the

road in Northern California at a retreat. I got to say Sarah, I love Northern California.

I really like Northern California. I think a lot of people on Twitter would not be surprised

to hear that. No, nothing to do with ideology. Everything to do with climate and geography.

So I was in... I think it's too cold. No, I see, I don't know. I mean, I've

born in Alabama, raised in the South. July, August, in 1st, part of September, not my

favorite times of the year. Hot and humid. Toughen up, David. Toughen up. But...

If my hair can frizz, so can yours. But I will just say I've been on the ground in

ground zero all over San Francisco yesterday and it is not a dystopian hellscape. It...

Interesting. Yeah, yeah. I kept wondering around looking for like the piles of hypodermic

needles. And I'm sure they're there somewhere. But the city looked lovely. It was a great day.

But anyway, this is not a San Francisco Northern California podcast. This is a legal podcast.

Indeed. And we've got law to talk about. So we're going to... Here's what we're going to do. We're

going to start with a roundup on the Supreme Court. We're going to run through some interesting

Supreme Court statistics. And then we're going to talk about, oh yes, you guessed it.

Anti-CRT laws, not really civil rights laws as a response to toxic anti-racist or critical racist

theory teaching. There's been a case filed and actually a couple of cases filed. And we're going

to walk through those and we're going to give you guys a lesson so that when at your next

con at your next cocktail party, when somebody invariably burns up the difference between just

hearing speech you don't like and discriminatory harassment, you're going to be able to answer

that question. You're going to be the center of attention as you opine on this. So the first,

...