meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Ricochet Superfeed

Gray Matters: Patrick McLaughlin on PLF’s Nondelegation Project

The Ricochet Superfeed

Ricochet

Politics, News

4.4652 Ratings

🗓️ 25 February 2026

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Jace Lington and Bennett Nuss chat with Patrick A. McLaughlin about The Nondelegation Project at the Pacific Legal Foundation, which analyzes compliance with the nondelegation doctrine using AI and machine learning. He highlights the significant number of regulatory restrictions in the CFR, the role of vague statutes, and the importance of judicial doctrines like the intelligible […]

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to Gray Matters, the podcast of the Seaboard and Grace Center for the study of the administrative state.

0:16.4

I'm Jace LinkedIn, the Gray Center's Policy and Strategy Director.

0:19.7

With me again today is Bennett Neuss,

0:21.5

our research director. Hello, Bennett. Hey, thanks for going on the fort while I was gone. Yeah,

0:26.1

thanks for coming back. We're pleased to be joined today by Patrick McLaughlin. He's a research

0:31.6

fellow at the Hoover Institution and a visiting research fellow at the Pacific Legal Foundation,

0:36.4

where he helped develop the

0:37.6

non-delegation project, which is what brings them to us today. Patrick, welcome to Grey Matters.

0:42.7

Thanks, guys. It's my pleasure to be here. So tell us a little bit about the non-delegation

0:47.4

project. How did you get started with all this? Well, I should tell everyone that first I'm an

0:52.7

economist, not a legal scholar, but nonetheless,

0:57.1

my whole career has really centered around ways that we can take the unstructured data

1:05.7

that is contained in legal texts, whether that statutes or regulations, and somehow turn that into

1:13.5

structured data that people like me, economists, or people with a quantitative bent, can

1:19.2

use to answer questions such as how do regulatory trends, how does regulatory policy

1:27.1

overall affect things like economic growth

1:29.9

or employment rates? So that was the impetus really for much of my career what I've been

1:37.4

doing. And that led me into the non-delegation project. So in the non-delegation project, I wanted to dig into a question of non-delegation.

1:50.8

We can probably explain what I'd mean there in a moment, but of the regulations that exist

1:55.7

in the Code of Federal Regulations, can we figure out, is there a number or a percentage of them that arguably

2:04.2

violate the non-delegation principle?

2:08.3

And if we can figure that out, what does that mean?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Ricochet, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Ricochet and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.