All right. Let's get to part three of today's show.

And part three of today's show. and I'm curious what you guys are going to think about this.

I'm going to put some graphics on the board later.

I don't have those graphics ready just yet.

But there's a lot of talk in college football about the imbalance schedules.

There's a lot of talk about teams going away from playing tough non-conference games.

There's a lot of talk about, you know, how can you really evaluate how good a team is

because the schedules are so varied in the different leagues.

You know, you've got a team like Georgia with their schedule, and then you have a

team like, I mean, some of the Missouri, Tennessee, Vanderbilt that played relatively simple

schedules last year, finishing the year in the top 25, Vanderbilt finishes top 25. They don't

beat a single ranked team all year. They still

win 10 games. Then you have teams like Indiana who played one really good opponent in the regular

season and two maybe in Iowa. Very soft schedule after that. And then you have a team like Ohio

State who a couple of years ago had a really tough schedule. But this year, the only really tough game they played all regular season,

it was against Texas in the non-conference.

And then you have a team like Wisconsin, who obviously is not one of the top teams.

And this past year, they had to play Michigan, Iowa, Ohio State, Oregon, Washington, Indiana,

Illinois, and Minnesota. They played one Big Ten team that didn't make it to a bowl game this

year. And now is Maryland, a team that beat them. So you look at a schedule like that, and there's such an imbalance schedule in these

leagues because what they've done is they've gone to where there's no more divisions.

There's just 16 to 18 teams, and they get these random schedules. Carmon Humphrey just brought

...