Teach fertility awareness to your clients and master the skill of advanced chart interpretation.

Learn to support your clients through their cycle irregularities and hormone imbalances with confidence.

Our fertility awareness mastery mentorship is now accepting applications for our next class in January, 26.

Head over to fertility friday.com slash fam live to apply today.

That's fertility friday.com slash f-a-m-m-L-I-V-E.

This is the Fertility Friday podcast, episode number 596.

Thank you. Fidelity Friday podcast, episode number 596.

In today's episode, I'm tackling a really interesting topic.

This is kind of like a follow-up to the conversation that I had with Dr. Sarah Hill.

For those of you who listened to that recent episode, you could tell that my mind was blown.

And for many years, I've known that women are excluded from a lot of the studies that are done.

A lot of our science, the vast majority of our science is based on the male body and male

physiology.

And I also knew that the majority of animal studies that have been done have also been done on male animals. But I feel like

the conversation I had with Dr. Sarah Hill really sparked some more specific and nuanced details

that I hadn't really looked into. So that's what we're doing in today's

episode. We're taking a peek at how science has been done and delving a little bit deeper into

these topics. And I'm also going to be talking about how even when women are studied and the

specific goal of the study is to derive information about women, that there's still room for improvement

in terms of those study designs. So hold on to your hats because today's episode is going

to be really interesting.

The paper that I'm going to be going over today is called unmasking the adverse impacts of sex bias on science

...