meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Science of Everything Podcast

Episode 67: An Overview of Language Part 2

The Science of Everything Podcast

James Fodor

Social Sciences, Natural Sciences, Science

4.8819 Ratings

🗓️ 23 November 2014

⏱️ 41 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Concluding the brief exploration of language begun last time, this episode examines semantics, including the distinction between sense and reference and different types of utterances, pragmatics, including conversational maxims and implicatures, and sociolinguistics, including prestige dialects and speech acts. Recommended pre-listening is Episode 66: An Overview of Language Part 1.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Oh, wow, oh, oh, whoa, oh, wow.

0:13.0

Oh, wow.

0:15.0

Oh, yeah. You're listening to The Science of Everything podcast episode 67, an overview of language

0:38.0

part two, and I'm your host, James Fodor.

0:41.0

So in the last episode, we looked at language, and I gave an overview of the different

0:45.0

subfields of linguistics, and I talked about the first few of those, so phonetics, phonology,

0:49.5

and morphology.

0:50.6

In this episode, I'm going to continue that discussion and look at some of the other areas that we didn't get to, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics.

0:58.2

So, let's jump right in.

0:59.7

So let's move on from syntax to semantics, which is my personal favorite subfield of linguistics.

1:05.6

And I'm not sure if linguists would agree with this, but I would tend to say that it's the one we know the least about.

1:10.3

It's the one that know the least about. It's the one that's sort of least well developed. This is how you actually get meaning out of all of

1:14.2

those phonemes and morphemes and all the syntax and put all that together, but how does the meaning

1:19.6

actually come out of it? What is it that distinguishes colorless green ideas sleep furiously from

1:24.7

that? What does it distinguish as that sentence from I had a good sleep last night. Both of them are grammatical, and both of them use, you know, the same collection

1:30.7

of morphines and phonies and things like that. They're both in the same language, but one makes

1:34.7

sense and the other one doesn't make sense. One has meaning, the other one doesn't have meaning.

1:37.9

What is it that it sort of distinguishes those two? What's going on there? How is it that we get meaning out of abstract arbitrary units of sound or

1:46.4

squiggles on a paper at all? I mean, when I say tree, that's just an arbitrary collection of sounds.

1:51.1

What does it have to do with this thing that has bark and leaves and grows? How do you get the

1:56.3

idea of tree in your mind when I say this string of symbols, or when I write down this string of symbols

2:02.6

in case of written language, or when I say this string of sounds in the case of spoken

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from James Fodor, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of James Fodor and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.