meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Weird Studies

Episode 61: Evil and Ecstasy: On 'The Silence of the Lambs'

Weird Studies

Phil Ford and J. F. Martel

Society & Culture, Arts, Philosophy

4.8688 Ratings

🗓️ 4 December 2019

⏱️ 67 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Welsh writer Arthur Machen defined good and evil as "ecstasies." Each one is a "withdrawal from the common life." On this view, any artistic investigation into the nature of good and evil can't remain safely ensconced our modern, common-life construal of thinigs. It must become fantastic and incorporate aspects of "nature" that feel "supernatural" from a modern standpoint. Jonathan Demme's screen adaptation of The Silence of the Lambs is a powerful example. The film oscillates undecidably between a straightforward crime story and a work of supernatural horror. In this episode, JF and Phil cast Hannibal Lecter and Clarice Starling as figures in a myth that pits the individual against the institution, the singular against the type, and the forces of light against the forces of darkness. REFERENCES Jonathan Demme (dir.), The Silence of the Lambs Thomas Harris, The Silence of the Lambs (original novel) Carl Jung on the doctrine of Privatio Boni Johann Sebastian Bach, The Goldberg Variations William Gibson, Pattern Recognition Rolling Stones, "Sympathy for the Devil" Howard Shore, Canadian composer Arthur Machen, The White People Weird Studies, episode 3: Ecstasy, Sin, and "The White People" Machen, The White People Machen, Hieroglyphics: A Note Upon Ecstasy in Literature Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Spectrevision Radio

0:03.3

Welcome to Weird Studies, an arts and philosophy podcast with hosts Phil Ford and J.F. Martel.

0:23.3

For more episodes or to support the podcast, go to weirdstudies.com. First principles, Clarice, simplicity.

0:52.3

Read Marcus Aurelius, of each thing, ask what is it in itself?

0:58.6

What is its nature?

1:00.7

What does he do, this man you seek?

1:05.9

He kills him.

1:07.8

No, that is incidental.

1:13.6

What is the first and principal thing he does? What needs does he serve by killing?

1:16.6

Anger.

1:18.6

Um, social acceptance and, uh, sexual frustrations.

1:24.6

No.

1:25.6

He covets. Hi, he covets.

1:30.9

Hi, welcome to Weird Studies. I'm Phil Ford.

1:36.0

This week, J.F. and I are discussing Jonathan Demi's film Silence of the Lambs,

1:39.4

a film that rattled everyone's cage back in 1991,

1:43.8

and has subsequently spawned a small industry of academic interpretation, whether feminist,

1:45.5

psychoanalytic, Marxist, post-structuralist, or what have you. In this episode, we throw one more

1:52.1

log on that exegetical fire, and I'd like to think that we come up with a few new things to say.

1:57.9

For while Marxo-Licanian readings are all very well in their way, I can't help feeling

2:02.8

that they usually end up ignoring Hannibal Lecter's excellent advice to Clary Starling. Ask of

2:08.7

each particular thing, what is it in itself? What is Hannibal Lecter in himself? Is he a figure

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Phil Ford and J. F. Martel, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Phil Ford and J. F. Martel and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.