conversation really about the notion of an authoritarian government or an authoritarian

administration coming into play but most of that has been rooted in the rhetoric that we've

heard from Donald Trump yesterday these Supreme Court decisions particularly the

two that we've been discussing with regards to the FTC and the and the Fed they made

that more of a reality and I was very curious going into yesterday how they were going to

toll the line between the two agencies and make a difference. And it seems to me that the impact

that they understood these justices knew that this could have with respect to Lisa Cook and the

Federal Reserve on the economy as a whole. And the implications going forward likely played a role in how they

decided that case. On the other hand, when you're talking about the amount of power that has now

been given to the president and the executive branch to make these unilateral decisions

about administrative agencies, that is a scary thing to think about because of the fact that

these willing are supposed to be that these willy are supposed

to be independent organizations.

These are supposed to be independent agencies that don't get into the type of politicized nature

of what Donald Trump would like to see happen from his leadership.

Look, it was a good day for democracy.

I mean, you point out that Donald Trump has been trying to undermine free and fair

elections for almost as long as he's been in public life. I mean, remember, this is the guy who

spread the birth or conspiracy about Barack Obama and whether he was eligible. And in 2020, I remember

very well those cases in Nevada, which we were happy to win in route to winning more than

60 cases against Donald Trump, won a big election contest in Nevada that year, written actually by a Republican trial judge and affirmed unanimously by the state Supreme Court.

And look, today's decision should have been a unanimous decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, but it wasn't.

...