In a 5-4 decision, the Justice has upheld a 2020 Mississippi law that says mail-in ballots still count if they are postmarked by Election Day and arrive within five days.

Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney-Barrant rejected a radical attempt by Republicans to rewrite election law.

Quote, the Election Day statutes say nothing about ballot receipt, and we cannot add to the words Congress chose.

Democracy docket adds this, quote, in addition to protecting similar laws in 13 other states and Washington, D.C.,

this ruling will make it harder for the GOP to mount a legal assault on early voting,

which legal experts said would be likely if the court ruled for the RNC.

Quote, it also spares laws in 17 states that specifically provide ballot receipt grace periods for military and overseas voters.

In the last hour, Donald Trump reacted to the ruling. Lost his mind, is what we'd say,

if he were anyone but the president, by making baseless claims again, that mail-in voting, which is how

he votes, is, quote, cheating. What comes next for the SAVE Act after today's ruling?

Well, because of the mail-in ballot ruling, which was a little bit surprising, gives people

more time to vote illegally, let's say. But the SAVE Act is even more important, and that's

the right. Do you have to be a citizen of our country? Okay, you have to show you're a citizen

of our country called citizenship.

Voter ID by photo, photo voter ID, and no mail-in ballots, unless you're in the military,

disabled, you're ill or you're away, or even on a vacation, we're being very open about it.

It's pretty easy. And we'll have honest elections. But the ruling, which a lot of people were waiting for, that was a ruling that was, I think it was very detrimental to honest elections. But it is what it is. Basically, they're keeping it a little bit the way it is now. They may have a little bit of a restriction on based on the word. And then you have the, the very important one, the slaughter case, which

we'll talk about if you ask that question, but the parliamentarian, what were you asking about?

Yeah, have you talked with Thune about. I have, no, I can't imagine why you'd keep a woman that was put there by Harry Reid and Barack

San Obama. I cannot understand it.

The leader has the right to fire the person at will and put somebody else there.

That could be, because we get so many negative rulings from her to parliamentarian.

...